Saturday, April 14, 2012

Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex


This book seemed to promise something that I had always wanted, and interesting, funny look at science and sex.  However, I didn't find it to really accomplish what I hoped it would.  I was expecting to learn something interesting about the study of sex, and there was only limited amount of this.  I was especially expecting a clear call to action or something that we should all do to help improve the research in this important area.  I was really left cold on that aspect of things.  I think I could have come up with a more specific, dramatic call to action myself, without having nearly the passion for this subject that Mary clearly has.

I think I could have covered the useful bits of this book in about a quarter of the time, maybe less.  Overall, there was just too much jumping back and forth to footnotes and various other things that Mary found funny or entertaining, but that weren't generally engaging or relevant to what I thought the book was supposed to cover.  Even worse was when she jumped into the macabre and unusual sexual practices for no apparent reason other than she thought these various stories were interesting to her.  They didn’t help build the points she was building to in any way.  Often times they were actually contradictory to what she was trying to say.  That was true about much of the research that she mentioned.  She didn’t take any clear stance on most of the issues either, she just presented ‘things you might want to know.’  That’s not my interest in reading a book from someone that has clearly spent much more time thinking about this than I have.  I do appreciate the effort to try and bring to light our general puritanical views about sex and sex research, and how much we still have to go before we really understand sex on a scientific level.  However, that could have been accomplished better and in less pages. 

Personally, I would not read it again, nor would I recommend to most people.  If there is an abridged version, it might be somewhat more compelling.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

The Big Short - Review

This book was really good.  I definitely got the message Michael Lewis was trying to get across.  Wallstreet should be around to efficiently deploy capital.  It's way less profitable to do that sort of thing now, and so there's been a creation of business that has a sole purpose of making some big bets.  This is fine in some sense, but it creates no real value.  It's in essence just using lots of services to create complicated gambling.  We should work as a society to try and limit this.

We've all got to take a deeper look at this stuff and not just push the burden of understanding how and why these businesses exist to other people.  If we all took a bit more personal responsibility in understanding this stuff, then we could more easily change it.